Transcription of Handwriting in EFTA00157051-EFTA00157053

[3dithKohn]

{Page 1 - EFTA00157051}
Rocchio prep - 11/9/21
Hotel
Gov provided Lr's business class Amtrak to NY
Cote
Cliff bar
pens

[illegible] at some point, [REDACTED] came in)

Lit on incremental disclosure is established in clinical settings but it's more [illegible]
in forensic literature
tho has a specific meaning in lit about children telling in bits/pieces
What people tell to home evolves over time - different issue
when asked in Forensic settings

Described [illegible] 2021 addressed Bennet + O'Donohue
incorporates prior articles
5 grooming stages/strategies (see [illegible], validation of sexual grooming model)
witness prep
Only a few patients experiences CSA outside of relationship
Duran - doesn't just look at one setting of coercive control.
[illegible]: New valid tool, context analysis, [illegible] reliability
Reliability from commorality included across setting
More recent studies than Bennett + O'Donohue deal w/ [illegible]
Validated model - experts agree on measurable steps in grooming process

No single [illegible] definition but [illegible] a pattern
Winters 2020 Tbl 1 - may not have been consensus on best strategy
but there is other literature too

These articles are doing further [illegible] of a well studied concept
see Dietz article
Can't predict in context of should-have-known
civil cases
Good points on [illegible], difficulties for lay ppl to understand, problematic lit
leads to victim blaming

{Page 2 - EFTA00157052}
LR agrees that the lit isn't good at predicting groomed ppl ahead of time/
hard to spot it's happening

LR had patient abused by priest, processed as special attention at 1st
works w/ variety of financial backgrounds
some [illegible] w/o had some bit of marginalization
@ Yale, lots of children come from financially disadvantaged backgrounds

Prevalence data
Revictimization literature
Show vulnerability, even if different from specific
targets (e.g. economic disadvantage in Winters)

There is 3rd party accomplice/coercive control lit, but not "more comfortable" lit that LR has found
3rd party "make comfortable" point can be any third party
Also, an "accomplice" is not a psychological concept
for a variety of crimes people work in groups

Winters has an article applying her grooming/CSA model to show [illegible]
sex trafficking

LR uses "child" to mean U18
Disclosure happens in a relational context ([illegible])
Incremental disclosure is hypothesis to explain kids giving different
answers when interviewed. Lot is equivocal.
Not always disclose whole story - depends on context
talks about types of factors that influence
what, when, or to whom
LR does [illegible] on what people talk about
may come out as beginning, middle, or end
[illegible]
LR has also taught about delayed disclosure
Consequences: ppl who suffered CS are at higher risk for effects
not clear cause + effect, there are mediators

{Page 3 - EFTA00157053}
Huge studies show more trauma → higher risks
1992 both trauma + recovery supports point about repeated SA/consequences
by Judith Helman

LR has not yet been paid/billed
currently, 60-70% of girls abused, 30-40% sexual in some way
Forensic practice involve examining perpetrators specifically

Common in social science to use a definition, not expect 100% agreement
disagreement on degree to which this or that is measurable, etc.
There can be a lot of variability in how people tell
clinical practice - some patients ask for her view on whether something happened she ∅ answer
Kids more likely to disclose when directly asked
Couldn't predict w/ certainty whether someone will disclose
Has not seen Netflix doc or TV interviews related to case
Aware of some basics
Study of traumatic stress + IPV is highly specialized, there are lots of
myths the field dispels

Hindsight bias - people think they are better at doing perspective analysis than
they are

Retrospective/prospective distinction is common in social science, e.g. violence
Not aware of any reason prior sexual behavior affects
ability to create relationship of trust + affection
unless prior relationship was abuse → more risk
Doesn't make [illegible] sense
Dietz work shows it's problematic

Winters research generally is replicating what we know + pushes the [illegible] forward
Winters is the 1st [illegible] to be validated in this way, by experts.
There are other ways, like common factors
This is [illegible]

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 157051.pdf